Details
-
Type:
New Feature
-
Status:
Resolved
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 2.2
-
Fix Version/s: 2.2
-
Component/s: PicoContainer Gems
-
Labels:None
-
Testcase included:yes
-
Patch Submitted:Yes
-
Number of attachments :
Description
This is the other project I had sitting on my drive for a little while.
The performance gains are demonstrated in the test cases, and depending on the situation, it might be a significant improvement.
However, because of the complexity of handling instance registrations, it has some funky rules to use properly. (See Javadoc included in class).
So, I'm kind of at a 50/50 on whether this is something appropriate for Gems.
Activity
committed (with tiny mods)
2.5x performance improvement over the the same scenario (discard, repopulate, discard, repopulate) over DefaultPicoContainer
How do your feel about this Mike? Considering the http://picocontainer.org/web-frameworks.html page I mean.
Show
Paul Hammant
added a comment - committed (with tiny mods)
2.5x performance improvement over the the same scenario (discard, repopulate, discard, repopulate) over DefaultPicoContainer
How do your feel about this Mike? Considering the http://picocontainer.org/web-frameworks.html page I mean.
Paul Hammant
added a comment - committed (with tiny mods)
2.5x performance improvement over the the same scenario (discard, repopulate, discard, repopulate) over DefaultPicoContainer
How do your feel about this Mike? Considering the http://picocontainer.org/web-frameworks.html page I mean. Committed to source by Paul.
Show
Michael Rimov
added a comment - Committed to source by Paul.
Michael Rimov
added a comment - Committed to source by Paul. 
Helps if I include the diff